OAR

Organization for the Assabet River
9 Damon Mill Square
Suite 1E
Concord, MA 01742

Tel: 978-369-3956
Email: oar@assabetriver.org

Water Quality

 
How to interpret the data
OAR's Monitoring Programs  

In 1992, OAR started a testing water quality to evaluate the impact of wastewater treatment plant upgrades completed in the late 1980s. OAR volunteers have tested water quality every summer since 1992. Over the years, we have updated our methods, improved our data handling, and increased the number of sampling sites. In April 2000 the EPA approved OAR’s sampling methods as documented in the program’s Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP). In 2002, OAR added streamflow and water quality monitoring on the major tributaries to the Assabet River with the StreamWatch Project. Today OAR tests water quality at 15 mainstem sites distributed from the headwaters of the Assabet River in Westborough to the end of the Concord River in Lowell. (View map)

Plant biomass: In 2005, OAR started monitoring the growth of aquatic plants in the river to be ready to measure changes (hopefully for the better) in the mass of plants in the river as upgrades are made to the watershed's wastewater treatment plants. This work is sponsored in-part by a grant from the Massachusetts Environmental Trust.

Water quality data and reports are available below and on the StreamWatch page (for each tributary stream).

Beakers
Bench-top chemistry - 1992During the last decade OAR's monitoring program has helped to raise awareness of the Assabet's nutrient problem, pointed to the need for stricter phosphorus limits in the wastewater treatment plant's NPDES permits, made a strong case for the Total Maximum Daily Loading (TMDL)  study, and indicated the need for a groundwater model of the Assabet watershed. Water quality and flow data collected under OAR's EPA-approved QAPP may be used by EPA and DEP in making regulatory decisions.

WQ Program Reports
Right click to download OAR's complete water quality reports (in pdf format): 

1992 1992 Report (100KB)   1992 - 1997 Data (76KB)
1999 1999 Report (500KB) 1999 Data Appendix (86KB)
2000 2000 Report (500KB)  2000 Data Appendix (114KB)
2001 2001 Report(2.0 MB) 2001 Data Appendix (2.3MB)
2002 2002 Report (2.2MB) 2002 Data Appendix (96KB)
2003 2003 Report (1.3MB) 2003 Data Appendix II (68KB)
2003 Data Appendix III (75KB)
2004 2004 Report (1.0MB)

2004 Data Appendix II (64KB)
2004 Data Appendix III (72KB)

2005 2005 Biomass Report (84KB) Biomass Data Appendix (1.8MB)
2005 2005 Report (781KB)

2005 Data Appendix II (45KB)
2005 Data Appendix III (37KB)

2006 2006 Report (818 KB)

2006 Data Appendix I Water Quality (41KB)
2006 Data Appendix II Biomass (880KB)
2006 Data Appendix III StreamHealth (31KB
)


What do we test?

OAR's monitoring program focuses on a set of interrelated chemical and physical parameters that can be directly measured in the river. These parameters are also among those used by the Mass DEP for setting water quality standards and regulating discharge permits for wastewater discharge (NPDES permits).

Parameters:

  • Dissolved Oxygen
  • Phosphorus (total and dissolved)
  • Nitrogen (nitrate, ammonia, total Kjeldahl nitrogen)
  • Solids (total suspended)
  • pH
  • Water temperature
  • Streamflow

General Findings:

Nutrient Saturation in the Mainstems
High concentrations of both phosphorus and nitrogen compounds act like fertilizer in the river, contributing to the overgrowth of aquatic plants and algae. OAR's water quality data supports the conclusion that the mainstem Assabet is nutrient saturated - that neither phosphorus nor nitrogen concentrations limit the growth of aquatic plants in the river.
Stream-side chemistry - 2001

In the upper sections of the Assabet (where dilution of the wastewater treatment plant effluent by natural flow is the least) nutrient concentrations are well above the thresholds for eutrophication for both phosphorus and nitrogen species. In the lower reaches of the river (below Rte 62 in Stow) nutrient concentrations, although still elevated, are lower than in the upstream sections. Nutrient concentrations at the three Concord River mainstem sites tested are generally lower than upstream concentrations, but still exceeded the thresholds for eutrophication. Downstream concentrations may be lower because: (1) the proportion of natural flow to effluent is larger (more tributaries have joined the mainstem); (2) nutrients are taken up by aquatic plants during the growing season; (3) and particle-bound nutrients are deposited to the sediments in the slow-moving river sections.

To support fish and other aquatic life dissolved oxygen concentrations in the river need to be above 5.0 mg/L or 60% saturation (the state's warm water Class B standard) and below about 170% saturation. Plants generate oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis during the day, and take oxygen back out of the water column as they respire at night. So, when there are heavy growths of aquatic plants, dissolved oxygen concentrations can change dramatically over the day. Dissolved oxygen at sites all along the river fall below 5.0 mg/L at times during the summer.

Sure is green out here.Eutrophied Impoundments
The slow-moving river sections behind dams along the river (called "impoundments") show the effects of eutrophication more severely than free-flowing sections of the river. The impoundments have heavier rooted aquatic plant growth and duckweed accumulations, lower minimum daily dissolved oxygen concentrations, and larger daily changes in dissolved oxygen concentration. In 2005, OAR started a multi-year survey to measure the summertime growths of aquatic plants in the impoundments. With this information, we hope to measure reductions in the mass of aquatic plants as total phosphorus discharged to the river from the wastewater treatment plants is reduced as the treatment plants are upgraded.

Healthier Tributaries
Water quality in the Assabet headwater (upstream of the first wastewater treatment plant discharge) and in tributary streams of the watershed is generally better than in the mainstem. Median phosphorus concentrations were lower in the tributaries than in the Assabet or Concord mainstems, and dissolved oxygen levels are mainly healthy. Total nitrogen concentrations in the tributaries, although lower than in the mainstem, ranged from healthy to somewhat elevated (> 0.75mg/L). Nutrients in the tributaries are mainly from non-point sources such as stormwater runoff from roads and lawns or failing septic systems.


How to interpret the data

Water quality measurements can be compared with:

  • Water quality standards set by the state: Massachusetts DEP’s Class B Water Quality Standards (DEP site) and the Massachusetts 2002 Integrated List of Waters (DEP site).
  • Data collected by US EPA in rivers in the same ecoregion; i.e. “reference conditions” (EPA site); nutrient concentrations less than the 25th percentiles, listed below, would be considered unimpaired.
  • Water quality recommendations for maintaining healthy fish habitat (see the StreamWatch Stream Health Index. )
Massachusetts Standards
Parameter  Standard
Dissolved oxygen* >= 5.0 mg/l and 60% saturation for warm water fisheries
>= 6.0 mg/l and 75% saturation for cold water fisheries
pH* 6.5-8.3 for inland waters
Nutrients* "control cultural eutrophication"
Temperature* <= 28.3 C and less than 2.8 C deviation for warm water fisheries
<= 20.0 C and less than 1.7 C deviation for cold water fisheries
Suspended Solids**  Aquatic life: 25 mg/L maximum and less than 10 mg/l increase due to a discharge
Aesthetics
Biocommunity**
Primary or secondarily contact recreational use: no nuisance organisms that render the water aesthetically objectionable or unusable, "best professional judgment"; cover of macrophytes < 50% within any portion of the lake area at maximum extent of growth.
Fecal coliforms** Primary contact recreational use -- Dry weather guidance: (<5 samples taken) <= 400 cfu/100ml. Wet weather guidance: dry weather samples meet and wet samples <=2000 cfu/100ml.
Secondary contact recreational use -- Dry weather guidance (< 5 samples taken) <=2000 cfu/100ml. Wet weather guidance: dry weather samples meet and wet samples <= 4000 cfu/100ml.
*MADEP 1997 Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards - 314 CMR 4.00 1997.
** MADEP 2002 Massachusetts Year 2002 Integrated List of Waters, Part 1.

 

Reference Conditions for Ecoregion XIV Subregion 59 Streams*
Parameter 
Reference condition
(25th percentile of June - September data)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)
0.025
Total Nitrogen (calculated) (mg/L)
0.44
NO2 + NO3 (mg/L)
0.34
TKN (mg/L)
0.30
* adapted from USEPA. 2000. Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations: Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion XVI. EPA 822-B-00-022. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria Division. Washington, D.C. December 2000.

 

Page updated: May 2007 (send comments to sflint@assabetriver.org)

4/24/05