In 1992, OAR started a testing water quality to evaluate the impact
of wastewater treatment plant upgrades completed in the late 1980s.
OAR volunteers have
tested water quality every summer since 1992. Over the years, we
have updated our methods, improved our data handling, and increased
the number of sampling sites. In April 2000 the EPA approved OARs
sampling methods as documented in the programs Quality Assurance
Program Plan (QAPP). In 2002, OAR added streamflow and water quality
monitoring on the major tributaries to the Assabet River with the StreamWatch Project. Today OAR tests
water quality at 15 mainstem sites distributed from the headwaters
of the Assabet River in Westborough to the end of the Concord River
in Lowell. (View map)
Plant biomass: In 2005, OAR started monitoring the growth of aquatic
plants in the river to be ready to measure changes (hopefully for
the better) in the mass of plants in the river as upgrades are made
to the watershed's wastewater treatment plants. This work is sponsored
in-part by a grant from the Massachusetts Environmental
Trust.
Water quality data and reports are available below and on the StreamWatch page (for each tributary stream). |
 |
General Findings:
Nutrient Saturation in the Mainstems
High concentrations of both phosphorus and nitrogen compounds act
like fertilizer in the river, contributing to the overgrowth of
aquatic plants and algae. OAR's water quality data supports the
conclusion that the mainstem Assabet is nutrient saturated - that
neither phosphorus nor nitrogen concentrations limit the growth
of aquatic plants in the river.

In the upper sections of the Assabet (where dilution of the wastewater
treatment plant effluent by natural flow is the least) nutrient
concentrations are well above the thresholds for eutrophication
for both phosphorus and nitrogen species. In the lower reaches of
the river (below Rte 62 in Stow) nutrient concentrations, although
still elevated, are lower than in the upstream sections. Nutrient
concentrations at the three Concord River mainstem sites tested
are generally lower than upstream concentrations, but still exceeded
the thresholds for eutrophication. Downstream concentrations may
be lower because: (1) the proportion of natural flow to effluent is larger
(more tributaries have joined the mainstem); (2) nutrients are taken
up by aquatic plants during the growing season; (3) and particle-bound
nutrients are deposited to the sediments in the slow-moving river
sections.
To support fish and other aquatic life dissolved oxygen concentrations
in the river need to be above 5.0 mg/L or 60% saturation (the state's
warm water Class B standard) and below about 170% saturation. Plants
generate oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis during the day,
and take oxygen back out of the water column as they respire at
night. So, when there are heavy growths of aquatic plants, dissolved
oxygen concentrations can change dramatically over the day. Dissolved
oxygen at sites all along the river fall below 5.0 mg/L at times
during the summer.
Eutrophied Impoundments
The slow-moving river sections behind dams along the river (called
"impoundments") show the effects of eutrophication more
severely than free-flowing sections of the river. The impoundments
have heavier rooted aquatic plant growth and duckweed accumulations,
lower minimum daily dissolved oxygen concentrations, and larger daily changes
in dissolved oxygen concentration. In 2005, OAR started a multi-year survey to
measure the summertime growths of aquatic plants in the impoundments.
With this information, we hope to measure reductions in the mass
of aquatic plants as total phosphorus discharged to the river from
the wastewater treatment plants is reduced as the treatment plants
are upgraded.
Healthier
Tributaries
Water quality in the Assabet headwater (upstream of the first wastewater
treatment plant discharge) and in tributary streams of the watershed
is generally better than in the mainstem. Median phosphorus concentrations
were lower in the tributaries than in the Assabet or Concord mainstems,
and dissolved oxygen levels are mainly healthy. Total nitrogen concentrations
in the tributaries, although lower than in the mainstem, ranged from
healthy to somewhat elevated (> 0.75mg/L). Nutrients in the tributaries
are mainly from non-point sources such as stormwater runoff from roads
and lawns or failing septic systems.
How to interpret the data
Water quality measurements can be compared
with:
- Water quality standards set by the state: Massachusetts
DEPs Class B Water Quality Standards (DEP
site) and the Massachusetts 2002 Integrated List of Waters
(DEP
site).
- Data collected by US EPA in rivers in the same
ecoregion; i.e. reference conditions (EPA
site); nutrient concentrations less than the 25th percentiles,
listed below, would be considered unimpaired.
- Water quality recommendations for maintaining
healthy fish habitat (see the StreamWatch
Stream Health Index. )
| Massachusetts
Standards |
| Parameter |
Standard |
| Dissolved oxygen* |
>= 5.0 mg/l and 60% saturation for warm
water fisheries
>= 6.0 mg/l and 75% saturation for cold water fisheries |
| pH* |
6.5-8.3 for inland waters |
| Nutrients* |
"control cultural eutrophication" |
| Temperature* |
<= 28.3 C and less than 2.8 C deviation
for warm water fisheries
<= 20.0 C and less than 1.7 C deviation for cold water
fisheries |
| Suspended Solids** |
Aquatic life: 25 mg/L maximum and less than
10 mg/l increase due to a discharge |
Aesthetics
Biocommunity** |
Primary or secondarily contact
recreational use: no nuisance organisms that render the water
aesthetically objectionable or unusable, "best professional
judgment"; cover of macrophytes < 50% within any portion
of the lake area at maximum extent of growth. |
| Fecal coliforms** |
Primary contact recreational use -- Dry weather
guidance: (<5 samples taken) <= 400 cfu/100ml. Wet weather
guidance: dry weather samples meet and wet samples <=2000
cfu/100ml.
Secondary contact recreational use -- Dry weather guidance
(< 5 samples taken) <=2000 cfu/100ml. Wet weather guidance:
dry weather samples meet and wet samples <= 4000 cfu/100ml. |
*MADEP
1997 Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards - 314 CMR
4.00 1997.
** MADEP 2002 Massachusetts Year 2002 Integrated List of Waters,
Part 1. |
| Reference
Conditions for Ecoregion XIV Subregion 59 Streams* |
| Parameter |
Reference condition
(25th percentile of June - September
data) |
| Total Phosphorus (mg/L) |
0.025 |
| Total Nitrogen (calculated) (mg/L) |
0.44 |
| NO2 + NO3 (mg/L) |
0.34 |
| TKN (mg/L) |
0.30 |
| *
adapted from USEPA. 2000. Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations:
Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion XVI. EPA 822-B-00-022.
United States Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Water,
Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria
Division. Washington, D.C. December 2000. |
|