OAR

Organization for the Assabet River
9 Damon Mill Square
Suite 1E
Concord, MA 01742

Tel: 978-369-3956
Email: oar@assabetriver.org

 

Other Studies : 

Assabet River near the Aqueduct in Northborough
TMDL / Groundwater Modeling / Water Balance / Sediment Quality / Sediment Remediation

Assabet River Nutrient TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Loading)

In July 1999, the state of Massachusetts and the US Army Corps of Engineers funded ENSR, a private consulting company, to carry out a nutrient TMDL study of the Assabet. A TMDL study is designed to assess how much pollution a water body can assimilate without exceeding state water quality standards. In 1999 and 2000, ENSR conducted intensive field sampling of the river to better define the river's eutrophication problem. The data collected was then used by ENSR to develop a watershed and water quality model of the Assabet River using the HSPF v10 application. After calibration and validation, the model was used to evaluate multiple future growth and remediation scenarios varying point and non-point source inputs. (Right click to download zipped folder with Phase I TMDL report).

In 2004, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) issued the final TMDL report (Report Number: MA82B-01-2004-01) concluding that the Assabet is "nutrient-saturated" and that significant decreases in the concentrations of nutrients in the river would be needed to improve water quality. The findings confirm that the majority of the nutrients entering the river come from the wastewater treatment plants that discharge treated effluent to the river. In particular, treatment plants are the major source of ortho-phosphorus (the bioavailable form of phosphorus) throughout the year. Non-point sources also contribute nutrients, but contribute significantly less, than the point sources over the growing season. The principal non-point source during the growing season, the report concludes, is phosphorus flux from the sediments.

  % Nutrient loading from Point Sources *
Total
 Phosphorus
Ortho-
Phosphorus
Total
Nitrogen
Nitrate 
Dry weather surveys 82-97% 97-98% 70-97% 78-99%
Wet weather surveys  23-91% 88-98% 32-88% 41-99%
* Point sources, the four major WWTP's: Westborough, Marlborough, Hudson, Maynard. Adapted from ENSR 2001.

With these findings in mind, the MA DEP's final TMDL report proposes a two-phased adaptive management plan for the Assabet River:

"Phase 1 will establish POTW effluent total phosphorus limits of 0.1 mg/l at all major POTWs discharging to the Assabet River and allow the communities sufficient time to fund and implement a detailed evaluation of impoundment sediment as a potential alternative to lower permit limits. DEP believes that some sediment and/or dam removal options will allow the Assabet River to achieve water quality standards faster and, possibly, be more cost effective, than establishing lower POTW total phosphorus limits and waiting for the system to respond over time.

Requirements will be incorporated into the NPDES permits to be developed and issued in 2004. Phase 1 will require that all POTWs be upgraded to achieve 0.1 mg/l of effluent phosphorus by April 2009 and the design should be consistent with adding new technology in the future to achieve further reductions if deemed necessary. Based upon the modeling results current permitted flows will be allowed. However, any request to increase a discharge beyond currently permitted volumes would require supporting documentation satisfying DEP’s Antidegradation Policy that no other feasible alternative exists including, but not limited to, the discharge of additional treated effluent to groundwater to help restore tributary flows. Phosphorus limits will be seasonal. DEP and EPA will jointly develop an implementation strategy in the Spring of 2008 to decide if, when, and to what level additional upgrades will be needed based upon the results and recommendations of the sediment evaluation.

Phase 2 limitations will be established in permits to be reissued in 2009 if sediment remediation, based upon the results of the sediment/dam evaluation, is not pursued, and/or new phosphorus criteria that may be developed in the interim by DEP and USEPA are applicable. If the communities choose to pursue sediment remediation alternatives, a revised schedule and work plan will be negotiated in the summer and fall of 2008. If the communities choose not to pursue sediment remediation alternatives they will be required to complete phase 2 improvements during the second 5-year permit cycle and begin operating by April 2013 and achieve the new limits by April 2014.

In the interim, prior to facility upgrades in 2009, the POTWs will be required to continue optimization of seasonal removal of total phosphorus in their effluents to meet the 2000 interim NPDES permit limits for total phosphorus of 0.75 mg/l.

Long-term monitoring of the Assabet River is essential to determine the efficacy of the adaptive management controls as they are implemented, to determine whether water quality standards have been achieved, or if additional source controls will be required. EPA and DEP will develop a detailed monitoring plan prior to implementation of Phase 1 upgrades. The agencies or their agents will implement the plan with assistance from the Assabet communities to evaluate and document water quality improvements and environmental indicators after POTW upgrades are completed during Phase 1.

This TMDL can be achieved through the continued cooperation, effort, and oversight of federal, state and municipal agencies along with the watershed stakeholders."

As of 2006 the towns of the Assabet River Consortium are studying ways to upgrade their wastewater treatment plants to meet the total phosphorus effluent limits set out in Phase 1.

Groundwater Modeling

In response to requests from OAR and the EOEA SuAsCo Watershed Team (now defunct), the US Geological Survey (USGS) and the Department of Environmental Management (now Dept. of Conservation and Recreation) agreed to evaluate ground-water management alternatives in the Assabet watershed by computer modeling. USGS used a MODFLOW groundwater model to assess the impact of existing and proposed groundwater withdrawals on streamflows in the Assabet River and its tributaries. A summary of this work (USGS Fact Sheet FS-2005-3034) is available on the USGS publications site.

   

Water Balance

The consulting firm Earth Tech prepared a water balance in 2002 for the six Assabet River Consortium communities (Shrewsbury, Westborough, Marlborough, Northborough, Hudson, and Maynard) as part of their Comprehensive Wastewater Facilities Planning work. This analysis shows that some drainages in the Assabet watershed are hydrologically stressed, that is, they are net exporters of ground water. Whether a drainage area is gaining or losing water may be significant for streams because exporting drainages, i.e. areas where more groundwater is pumped out of the ground than is replaced or "recharged," are at risk for reduced summer time stream flows because the aquifers are, in effect, being mined. (Read more.)

   

Sediment Quality and Phosphorus Dynamics

In 2003 USGS completed a study (Sediment Studies in the Assabet River, Central Massachusetts, 2003; U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5131) of sediment quality and sediment phosphorus dynamics the major impoundments of the Assabet River. (Read the USGS summary and download the complete report.)

   

Sediment Remediation

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) is currently studying the alternatives available for reducing internal phosphorus recycling from the sediments trapped behind the major dams along the Assabet River. OAR, the Assabet Consortium, MA DEP, EPA Region 1, and Massachusett Riverways Program participate on the study's Technical Advisory Committee. (See the ACOE Project Site.)

Sun, Apr 24, 2005